Links, 9/27/12 Edition
- Michael Cox: Why the hate for zonal marking?
- "The chief criticism of defending zonally is that no one takes
responsibility, an argument that misses the point entirely. Ex-coaches
who persist with this line of debate are actually adopting quite a
cowardly approach -- "No one takes responsibility" is a synonym for
"There's no player I can blame." Ironically, it also demonstrates
that they're unwilling to take responsibility themselves."
- Chris Rowland: Football and Finance, Liverpool and the top six
- " I hope I have been able to show a number of things. First, a realisation
of just how catastrophically wrong things went in the years ’09/10 –
’10/11. Liverpool had turned into a club who changed managers on a
yearly basis, wasted vast sums on a phantom stadium which couldn’t
possibly be financed, had begun the trend of decreased transfer spending
and swapped it for vast ineffective wage inflation, relying on player
sales to break even."
- Jonathan Wilson: The question: How troubling is Liverpool's start
- Already there has been a marked improvement in pass completion, up
from 80.9% to 86%, and from 73.24% to 78.9% in the opposition half. To
put that into context, last year's figures were the best for Liverpool
over a full season since Opta began collating data in 2006-07.The
problem is all too familiar. Last season Liverpool converted only 9.13%
of their chances, the lowest figure since Opta began producing its
reports. It had been 13.59% the previous season but then Liverpool
managed just 11.4 shots per game. When Liverpool finished second in
2008-09, they had 15.1 shots per game and converted 13.46% of their
chances. But if 9.13% looked bad, this season's figure is far worse: a
meagre 5.97%.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please participate in the discussion.